<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Random One</title>
	<atom:link href="http://therandomone.co.uk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://therandomone.co.uk</link>
	<description>An inside view of Joel&#039;s mind</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 15:42:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Downtime</title>
		<link>http://therandomone.co.uk/2010/06/25/downtime/</link>
		<comments>http://therandomone.co.uk/2010/06/25/downtime/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 15:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joel Nichols</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therandomone.co.uk/?p=55</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, basically UK-PLC decided to pull the plug on www.StuzzIT.com, meaning that I went and registered a new domain, www.StuzzHosting.com for my hosting business. However, this caused a lot of problems as many of my domains (before I got into the hosting business) were bought from UK-PLC, and all of my domains used nameservers at]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, basically UK-PLC decided to pull the plug on <a href="http://www.stuzzit.com">www.StuzzIT.com</a>, meaning that I went and registered a new domain, <a href="http://www.stuzzhosting.com">www.StuzzHosting.com</a> for my hosting business.</p>
<p>However, this caused a lot of problems as many of my domains (before I got into the hosting business) were bought from UK-PLC, and all of my domains used nameservers at StuzzIT.com. This meant a lot of downtime.</p>
<p>Of course, anyone hosted on StuzzIT.com has received a free month of hosting as my way of saying sorry for the downtime, as well as just a general thanks for staying with us.</p>
<p><strong>Welcome back to The Random One.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://therandomone.co.uk/2010/06/25/downtime/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FormSpring</title>
		<link>http://therandomone.co.uk/2010/04/12/formspring/</link>
		<comments>http://therandomone.co.uk/2010/04/12/formspring/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joel Nichols</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[formspring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[questions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therandomone.co.uk/?p=52</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.formspring.me/7031 That is my formspring URL. Feel free to ask me anything, as long as it&#8217;s reasonable and won&#8217;t result in my death.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.formspring.me/7031">http://www.formspring.me/7031</a></p>
<p>That is my formspring URL. Feel free to ask me anything, as long as it&#8217;s reasonable and won&#8217;t result in my death.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://therandomone.co.uk/2010/04/12/formspring/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Designing The Random One</title>
		<link>http://therandomone.co.uk/2010/04/12/designing-the-random-one/</link>
		<comments>http://therandomone.co.uk/2010/04/12/designing-the-random-one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joel Nichols</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therandomone.co.uk/?p=50</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Something you have to wonder, is the design of The Random One adequate? Currently, it&#8217;s a blog of course, and I intend to keep it that way, but you have to wonder, what level of functionality is the right one? Yes, I am The Random One.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something you have to wonder, is the design of The Random One adequate? Currently, it&#8217;s a blog of course, and I intend to keep it that way, but you have to wonder, what level of functionality is the right one?</p>
<p>Yes, I am The Random One.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://therandomone.co.uk/2010/04/12/designing-the-random-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Something big</title>
		<link>http://therandomone.co.uk/2010/04/09/something-big/</link>
		<comments>http://therandomone.co.uk/2010/04/09/something-big/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joel Nichols</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big idea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web based]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therandomone.co.uk/?p=47</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The title explains what I want to do. I want to make some form of a big web based project. I want to give something like this a go. If anyone has any ideas, post them in the comments. Let&#8217;s make things happen.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The title explains what I want to do. I want to make some form of a big web based project. I want to give something like this a go. If anyone has any ideas, post them in the comments.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s make things happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://therandomone.co.uk/2010/04/09/something-big/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>JoelsBox</title>
		<link>http://therandomone.co.uk/2010/03/28/joelsbox/</link>
		<comments>http://therandomone.co.uk/2010/03/28/joelsbox/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 22:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joel Nichols</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[/b/]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loop]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therandomone.co.uk/?p=45</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a bit of fun, went and made a random flash looper website with the help of Lappy and well, see if you like it: www.JoelsBox.uk.to]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Just a bit of fun</strong>, went and made a random flash looper website with the help of <a href="http://www.l4ppy.net">Lappy</a> and well, see if you like it:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.joelsbox.uk.to">www.JoelsBox.uk.to</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://therandomone.co.uk/2010/03/28/joelsbox/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sleep patterns</title>
		<link>http://therandomone.co.uk/2010/03/02/sleep-patterns/</link>
		<comments>http://therandomone.co.uk/2010/03/02/sleep-patterns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 01:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joel Nichols</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[naps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sleep]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therandomone.co.uk/?p=39</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve recently been talking with my friend, Jay Miller, about sleep patterns. I was saying about how, it seems in the long run, it doesn&#8217;t really matter when you sleep, as long as you get approximately 8 hours for every 16 hours you are awake. Jay pointed out that, in this case, one could have]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve recently been talking with my friend, Jay Miller, about sleep patterns. I was saying about how, it seems in the long run, it doesn&#8217;t really matter when you sleep, as long as you get approximately 8 hours for every 16 hours you are awake. Jay pointed out that, in this case, one could have 20 minute naps, 6 times a day, and still work efficiently.</p>
<p>Of course, this raises the question, does this affect the sleep cycle? It&#8217;s important to note that there are several different sleep stages, and it&#8217;s an interesting question as to whether or not these would all occur during these naps, and if not, are they necessary?</p>
<p>Jay claims that, while naps would reduce sleep inertia, he has reason to believe that there is evidence that memory could be affected by this.</p>
<p>Maybe if I get a lot of free time at some point I can test this out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://therandomone.co.uk/2010/03/02/sleep-patterns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Apparent Death of Studio7031?</title>
		<link>http://therandomone.co.uk/2010/02/27/the-apparent-death-of-studio7031/</link>
		<comments>http://therandomone.co.uk/2010/02/27/the-apparent-death-of-studio7031/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 14:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joel Nichols</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therandomone.co.uk/?p=36</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Moving Studio7031 over to the StuzzIT hosting has reminded me that well, Studio7031 is and has been dead for a while now, and sadly I can&#8217;t see that changing any time in the near future. I definitely enjoyed the time at which we were making videos, but it&#8217;s just not possible anymore. The equipment got]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moving Studio7031 over to the StuzzIT hosting has reminded me that well, Studio7031 is and has been dead for a while now, and sadly I can&#8217;t see that changing any time in the near future.</p>
<p>I definitely enjoyed the time at which we were making videos, but it&#8217;s just not possible anymore. The equipment got pretty much destroyed over the course of it all, and we made an extremely big loss, and hardly any gain whatsoever (yeah, the sponsors never paid up).</p>
<p>Simply put, I was destroyed emotionally and financially, yet at the same time, had we had more money, it wouldn&#8217;t have failed, but by more money, I mean a minimum of 65,000 pounds, 500,000 if possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://therandomone.co.uk/2010/02/27/the-apparent-death-of-studio7031/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Please Rob Me</title>
		<link>http://therandomone.co.uk/2010/02/18/please-rob-me/</link>
		<comments>http://therandomone.co.uk/2010/02/18/please-rob-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joel Nichols</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therandomone.co.uk/?p=29</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found a new website today &#8211; www.PleaseRobMe.com PleaseRobMe is essentially a Twitter based search engine that finds tweets posted with location information and possible information about when somebody might be out of the house. It then instructs the world to rob them. The developers claim that it was created solely to make people aware]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found a new website today &#8211; <strong><a href="http://www.pleaserobme.com">www.PleaseRobMe.com</a></strong></p>
<p><em>PleaseRobMe</em> is essentially a Twitter based search engine that finds tweets posted with location information and possible information about when somebody might be out of the house. <strong>It then instructs the world to rob them.</strong></p>
<p>The developers claim that it was created solely to make people aware of the issues of sharing this kind of information online, and I have to agree that it can be quite risky. At the same time however, I do like the fact that tweets are public, since it means I don&#8217;t have to approve anyone to see my updates (and of course, there is the option to make tweets private).</p>
<p><span id="more-29"></span></p>
<blockquote>
<p style="text-align: left;"><em>&#8216;Don&#8217;t get us wrong, we love the whole location-aware thing. The  information is very interesting and can be used to create some pretty  awesome applications. However, the way in which people are stimulated to  participate in sharing this information is less awesome.&#8217;</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p>One hopes that no actual robberies will actually take place as a result of this website, however it is very interesting to see how they&#8217;re able to obtain this information, using such a simple method. I&#8217;m sure it took no genuis to create this website, just the ambition to prove that it can be done.</p>
<p>Please note that I do not endorse anyone using the service mentioned to actually rob someone. Instead, I hope that this can be used to make people more aware of precautions that should be taken when posting information online.</p>
<p><strong>Have an opinion? Leave a comment.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://therandomone.co.uk/2010/02/18/please-rob-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VideoBlogging &#8211; Is it effective?</title>
		<link>http://therandomone.co.uk/2010/02/17/videoblogging-is-it-effective/</link>
		<comments>http://therandomone.co.uk/2010/02/17/videoblogging-is-it-effective/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 22:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joel Nichols</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webcam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therandomone.co.uk/?p=18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One question that goes through my mind is: Video blogging &#8211; is it effective? I suppose it all depends on how you look at it. Text blogs are easier to create by far for many people, and even when you do have a webcam, editing the blog entries together in a professional manner can definitely]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One question that goes through my mind is:</p>
<p><strong>Video blogging &#8211; is it effective?</strong></p>
<p>I suppose it all depends on how you look at it. Text blogs are easier to create by far for many people, and even when you do have a webcam, editing the blog entries together in a professional manner can definitely be time consuming. You also have to remember that people may be reading your blog from a place of work, for example, where it would not be feasible for them to watch a video, due to say, a lack of headphones.</p>
<p>It is also important to remember that most video sharing websites do require plug-ins such as <em>Adobe Flash</em> to function, which can limit accessibility, since not all people are able to use these. Of course, this is easily defeated by the fact that it&#8217;s estimated at least 90% of computer users have <em>Adobe Flash Player</em> installed, but devices such as the <em>iPhone</em> do not have any form of <em>Flash</em> support. The best option in this situation, of course, would be to link to an MP4 version of the file, for example.</p>
<p><span id="more-18"></span></p>
<p>However, text still ranks higher in my honest opinion, simply because one can easily scan through text, without having to watch an entire video to see what they want to see.</p>
<p>In some cases however, video does seem to be more effective in that it can be more engaging for an audience, and it can generally be perceived as less boring to view. Also, things that cannot easily be delivered through text could be through the use of audio and video.</p>
<p>My general feeling is that whether you want to use audio or video generally depends on what your purpose for your content is, but my advice to anyone reading is &#8211; Try both, see what you prefer doing.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s see what happens, maybe I&#8217;ll try video blogging on here for a while.</p>
<p><strong>Have an opinion? Leave a comment.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://therandomone.co.uk/2010/02/17/videoblogging-is-it-effective/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Too many blogs?</title>
		<link>http://therandomone.co.uk/2010/02/17/too-many-blogs/</link>
		<comments>http://therandomone.co.uk/2010/02/17/too-many-blogs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joel Nichols</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WWW]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therandomone.co.uk/?p=10</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The more I browse the internet, the more I have to feel bad about the fact that I run a blog. Why? Because there&#8217;s too many of them. If I recall correctly, the figure is approximately one blog created every 6 six minutes. Straight away, I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;re aware that most of these blogs probably]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The more I browse the internet, the more I have to feel bad about the fact that I run a blog. Why? Because there&#8217;s too many of them. If I recall correctly, the figure is approximately one blog created every 6 six minutes. Straight away, I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;re aware that most of these blogs probably never get updated again, or at least live a very short life (I myself am guilty of this), but I&#8217;m sure there are many blogs that still remain without any real purpose.</p>
<p><span id="more-10"></span></p>
<p>This begs the question, what websites do we actually need, and what should we do with the ones we don&#8217;t need? I suppose you could argue, the ones we don&#8217;t need aren&#8217;t really an issue, but you have to remember that they&#8217;re using up domain names that could be useful for other people who may actually need them. At the same time however, one of the great things about the internet is that anyone can contribute.</p>
<p>I suppose the best solution to this is to make more TLDs available. How about .blog or something similar for bloggers? I&#8217;m aware that more are going to be setup, but to be honest I think it would have been better if this had been the case from the start. I also would like to point out that creating more TLDs would still leave all of the .com, .net and .org sites on these old TLDs, and would also increase our dependency on search engines?</p>
<p><strong>Good or bad? Comment.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://therandomone.co.uk/2010/02/17/too-many-blogs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
